Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 2.29, Δ 1.40).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 590Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 660Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.