Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 0.21, Δ 0.81).
- Fredrikstad fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Ham-Kam was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 332 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 444 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |