Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (2.23 vs 0.99, Δ 1.24).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (20 vs 15 shots).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 390Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 11Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |