Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.74 vs 0.68, Δ 0.06).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 283 | Accurate passes | 480Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 556Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.