Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 0.89, Δ 1.50).
- Fredrikstad fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Lillestrom held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89 |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 332Lead |
| 381 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |