Match statistics snapshot
- Fredrikstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.61 vs 1.02, Δ 0.59).
- Fredrikstad fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Molde was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 1.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 350 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |