Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 2.29, Δ 0.40).
- Viking fired more attempts (23 vs 14 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 215 | Accurate passes | 410Lead |
| 327 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |