Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 0.90, Δ 0.29).
- Viking fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 0Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.