Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 2.17, Δ 1.49).
- Viking fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 393 | Total passes | 548Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fredrikstad | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |