Match statistics snapshot
- AC Milan created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 1.42, Δ 0.40).
- AC Milan fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Frosinone was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.