Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 1.80, Δ 0.50).
- Frosinone fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Frosinone was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 513Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |