Match statistics snapshot
- Frosinone created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 0.86, Δ 1.03).
- Mantova fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Frosinone was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 323Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 397Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -2.16 | Goals prevented | -2.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Frosinone | Statistic | Mantova |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.