Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.70, Δ 0.61).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Fulham held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 395 |
| 561Lead | Total passes | 462 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |