Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.70, Δ 0.35).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
| 14 | Total shots | 18Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 619Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.74 | Goals prevented | -0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |