Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (0.20 vs 1.29, Δ 1.09).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
- Fulham held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 0.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 543Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |