Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.00, Δ 0.20).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 566Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 656Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |