Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.12 vs 3.25, Δ 3.13).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (16 vs 1 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 56%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.25Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 352 | Accurate passes | 707Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 769Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.