Match statistics snapshot
- Fulham created the clearer chances on xG (2.18 vs 0.42, Δ 1.76).
- Fulham fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 343 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 404 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goals prevented | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |