Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.09, Δ 0.08).
- Fulham fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Fulham held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
1.01 | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.09Lead |
0Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 7 |
10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
4 | Shots off target | 4 |
5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
13Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 9 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
462Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
555Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
4Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
0.65 | Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. | 0.65 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+15% vs West Ham)
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+15% vs West Ham)
West Ham leads shot quality (+56% vs Fulham)
Fulham leads box penetration (+15% vs West Ham)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
West Ham leads this block
West Ham leads possession efficiency (+62% vs Fulham)
West Ham leads possession efficiency (+62% vs Fulham)
Fulham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+59% vs West Ham)
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+59% vs West Ham)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
West Ham — stronger shot quality allowed
West Ham — stronger shot quality allowed
Fulham leads keeper workload (+80% vs West Ham)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
West Ham leads (20.0 vs 18.0).
Fulham leads (49.8 vs 32.0).
Fulham leads (16.0 vs 11.0).
West Ham leads (0.121 vs 0.078).
West Ham leads (92.2 vs 87.9).
Fulham leads (20.0 vs 18.0).