Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 0.78, Δ 0.32).
- Fulham fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Fulham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 337 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 442 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |