Match statistics snapshot
- Future FC fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- El Dakhleya was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
- Future FC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Future Fc | Statistic | El Dakhleya |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Future Fc | Statistic | El Dakhleya |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 401 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Future Fc | Statistic | El Dakhleya |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Future Fc | Statistic | El Dakhleya |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Future Fc | Statistic | El Dakhleya |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |