Match statistics snapshot
- Future FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.97, Δ 0.25).
- Petrojet fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Future FC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 306Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.55 | Goals prevented | 0.55 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Petrojet |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.