Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Future FC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 19%).
- Pharco held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Future Fc | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.