Match statistics snapshot
- Gais fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
- Degerfors IF held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |