Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 2.21, Δ 0.38).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Gais was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.21Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 508Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 589Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |