Match statistics snapshot
- Gais created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.73, Δ 0.31).
- Gais fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 379 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.