Match statistics snapshot
- Gais fired more attempts (25 vs 13 shots).
- Gais was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 23%).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.