Match statistics snapshot
- Gais created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 1.77, Δ 0.39).
- Gais fired more attempts (29 vs 11 shots).
- Osters IF was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.77 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 29Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 281 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.