Match statistics snapshot
- Gamba Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (3.09 vs 0.69, Δ 2.40).
- Gamba Osaka fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 3.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 9 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 279Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 392Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.