Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 3.07, Δ 1.11).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Gamba Osaka held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.07Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 465Lead | Accurate passes | 258 |
| 561Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |