Match statistics snapshot
- CFR 1907 Cluj fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- GAZ Metan Medias was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gaz Metan Medias | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target |
| 6 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gaz Metan Medias | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gaz Metan Medias | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gaz Metan Medias | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gaz Metan Medias | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.