Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.52, Δ 0.83).
- Genk fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Anderlecht was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.52 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 454Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Anderlecht |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |