Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (1.84 vs 0.07, Δ 1.77).
- Genk fired more attempts (17 vs 3 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 1.84Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 364Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 439 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |