Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 0.68, Δ 2.03).
- Genk fired more attempts (34 vs 13 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 22Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 34Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 492Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 573Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 12Lead |
| 2.80 | Goals prevented | 2.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |