Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 0.37, Δ 1.49).
- Genk fired more attempts (28 vs 5 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 602Lead | Accurate passes | 141 |
| 687Lead | Total passes | 244 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |