Match statistics snapshot
- Cercle Brugge created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.28, Δ 0.13).
- Genk fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 334Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.