Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 0.56, Δ 2.15).
- Genk fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Genk held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 457Lead | Accurate passes | 217 |
| 563Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.89 | Goals prevented | 0.89 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.