Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 1.22, Δ 0.41).
- Genk fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Club Brugge KV was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 395Lead | Accurate passes | 357 |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.81 | Goals prevented | -0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |