Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (2.64 vs 0.43, Δ 2.21).
- Genk fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 2.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 351Lead |
| 419 | Total passes | 419 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Cukaricki |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.