Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 0.71, Δ 0.36).
- Genk fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Ferencvarosi TC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Ferencvarosi Tc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Ferencvarosi Tc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 324Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 390Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Ferencvarosi Tc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Ferencvarosi Tc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Ferencvarosi Tc |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |