Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (2.56 vs 1.70, Δ 0.86).
- Gent fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 2.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 303Lead |
| 347 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |