Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (2.17 vs 1.12, Δ 1.05).
- Genk fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 559Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.