Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 1.73, Δ 0.32).
- Genk fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73Lead |
| 7 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 7 | Shots off target |
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 392Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.43 | Goals prevented | -1.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genk | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |