Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 1.39, Δ 0.53).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Genoa | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Genoa | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 448Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Genoa | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Genoa | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.23 | Goals prevented | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Genoa | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |