Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (2.51 vs 1.57, Δ 0.94).
- Gent fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Antwerp was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 2.51Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 315 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 475Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.