Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.16, Δ 0.44).
- AS Eupen fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Gent was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 430Lead |
| 401 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |