Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 1.00, Δ 0.22).
- Club Brugge KV was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- Club Brugge KV held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 441Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 541Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |