Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.00 vs 2.11, Δ 1.11).
- Gent fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.11Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |
Statistics is not available yet.