Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (2.07 vs 2.00, Δ 0.07).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (24 vs 15 shots).
- Gent was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 353 |
| 456Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |