Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 0.68, Δ 1.02).
- Gent fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Maccabi Haifa was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gent | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gent | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 523Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 622Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gent | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gent | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gent | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.